Are AI researchers hypocritical for expressing concerns about the risks of AGI while working on AI?

No, AI researchers who work on making AI systems more understandable and aligned with human goals are not hypocritical as they are actively working to address the risks and make AI safer.

Do most technologists believe that AGI will be developed regardless of its potential dangers?

Yes, most technologists believe that technological progress is inevitable and that AGI will be developed, regardless of whether it is a good thing or not.

Why do researchers who are concerned about the potential dangers of AI choose to work on it?

Researchers who are concerned about the potential dangers of AI may choose to work on it in order to influence the field and make it safer.

Can researchers successfully work on AI despite concerns about its potential dangers?

Yes, researchers like Hinton and Bengio continue to work on AI despite concerns about its potential dangers.

The Dilemma: AI Skeptics Working on AI

Name: The Dilemma: AI Skeptics Working on AI
Uploaded: 2023-08-07 20:07:59
Description: Despite concerns about the potential risks and dangers of artificial general intelligence (AGI), researchers and technologists continue to work on AI because they believe in the benefits it can bring and their ability to navigate the challenges and ensure safety.

This article is a summary of a YouTube video "Why Do People Who Think AI Could Kill Us All Still Work on AI?" by The AI Breakdown: Artificial Intelligence News

TLDR Despite concerns about the potential risks and dangers of artificial general intelligence (AGI), researchers and technologists continue to work on AI because they believe in the benefits it can bring and their ability to navigate the challenges and ensure safety.

Key insights

🧠

The fact that AI researchers and experts are still working on AI suggests that there may be ways to mitigate the risks and ensure the safe development and deployment of AI technologies.
🧠

Some AI research may actually make it easier to control AGI in the future, reducing the likelihood of it causing harm to humanity.
🌍

Comparing AI research to energy research, it is not hypocritical for AI researchers to express concerns about the risks of AGI, even if they are actively involved in AI development, as they believe that being involved can lead to a better outcome.
🌟

Being a voice of caution in the field of AI can potentially influence other researchers to take the concern of extinction risk more seriously.
💡

Many technologists believe that the benefits of AGI would outweigh the risk of extinction, as they expect AGI to become far smarter than humans and create thousands of years of technological advancement within a few calendar years.
💡

Many techies are more excited about the potential cure for aging than the cure for cancer, highlighting the significant impact that reversing the aging process could have on human longevity.
⏳

"The only thing I want is for us to take our time and be incredibly cautious. About AI. Nothing in existence is as important as getting this right no matter how long we need to spend in order to do so."
💥

The idea of risking the extinction of the human species for the sake of building AGI is a controversial perspective held by some AI researchers, including Larry Page and Hugo de Garis.

Q&A

Why do researchers continue to work on AI despite concerns about its potential risks?

— Researchers continue to work on AI because they believe in the benefits it can bring and their ability to navigate the challenges and ensure safety.
Are AI researchers hypocritical for expressing concerns about the risks of AGI while working on AI?

— No, AI researchers who work on making AI systems more understandable and aligned with human goals are not hypocritical as they are actively working to address the risks and make AI safer.
Do most technologists believe that AGI will be developed regardless of its potential dangers?

— Yes, most technologists believe that technological progress is inevitable and that AGI will be developed, regardless of whether it is a good thing or not.
Why do researchers who are concerned about the potential dangers of AI choose to work on it?

— Researchers who are concerned about the potential dangers of AI may choose to work on it in order to influence the field and make it safer.
Can researchers successfully work on AI despite concerns about its potential dangers?

— Yes, researchers like Hinton and Bengio continue to work on AI despite concerns about its potential dangers.

Timestamped Summary

🤔

00:00
People concerned about AI's potential to cause extinction still work on AI because their specific research is not directly related to the development of AGI, and some research even aims to make AGI easier to control.
🤔

02:53
AI researchers who work on making AI systems more understandable and aligned with human goals are not hypocritical for expressing concerns about the risks of AGI, as they believe in the inevitability of technological progress and the unstoppable race to AGI.
🤔

04:30
Researchers concerned about AI's potential dangers work on AI to influence the field and make it safer, with some believing AGI is far enough away to continue working on AI while others prioritize cautious approaches to reduce extinction risk.
🤔

06:43
Scientists and technologists support AI research despite the potential risks, believing that the benefits of artificial super intelligence outweigh the dangers.
🤔

08:23
Many scientists prioritize finding a cure for aging over a cure for cancer, showing the conflicting views on the risks of AI and the desire for eternal youth.
🤔

09:59
Advancing AI can help address global risks like climate change and pandemics, but we need to be cautious and take our time to ensure it doesn't worsen these risks.
🤔

11:53
Despite the risk of human extinction, some technologists believe creating AGI is worth it due to its cosmic significance, leading them to work on AI.
🤔

13:22
People who work on AI despite concerns about its potential to harm us believe in our ability to avoid worst-case scenarios and think we have the capacity to navigate the challenges that arise as AI advances.