Defining Harm in AI Systems: Crucial for Responsibility and Liability

Play video
This article is a summary of a YouTube video "Defining Harm for Ai Systems - Computerphile" by Computerphile
TLDR Defining harm in AI systems is crucial for determining responsibility and liability, and addressing this issue is necessary for the adoption of autonomous systems in AI.

Timestamped Summary

  • 📝
    00:00
    Defining harm is crucial for determining responsibility and liability in situations involving autonomous cars, and a 2012 paper attempts to address this issue in the field of philosophy and computer science.
  • 🚗
    01:57
    An injured man wants to sue autonomous car manufacturers for a crash, but they claim he is not responsible for the car's actions.
  • 📺
    03:39
    The speaker explains that harm in AI systems is defined as a negative outcome resulting from an action, with the potential for a better outcome if a different decision had been made.
  • 😕
    06:03
    Bringing a disappointing gift is not considered harm, but falling below the default expectation of safety in an autonomous car can be considered harm.
  • 📝
    07:09
    Defining harm for AI systems involves assessing if slight modifications could have improved outcomes, disregarding unrealistic scenarios, and quantifying harm to determine insurance premiums.
  • 📺
    09:05
    Alice's decision to give a $5 tip instead of a $20 tip to the waiter is a dilemma of achievability, as it is debatable whether she should have given $20 or if she harmed the waiter by only giving $5.
  • 💡
    12:48
    Different treatments in AI systems can either harm or benefit patients based on their utility and probability of success.
  • 🤖
    16:09
    The adoption of autonomous systems in AI is dependent on solving moral dilemmas, including the need for explanations, addressing harm, and ensuring fairness, as insurance companies may block regulations until these issues are resolved.

Q&A

  • What is the concept of harm in AI systems?

    — The concept of harm in AI systems refers to when an action causes a negative outcome and there is a possibility of a better outcome if a different decision had been made.

  • Why is defining harm important in autonomous cars?

    — Defining harm in autonomous cars is important to determine responsibility and liability in situations involving accidents caused by these cars.

  • What are the options for an autonomous car when faced with a stationary car on the road?

    — An autonomous car has three options when faced with a stationary car on the road: alert the distracted driver, do nothing and crash into the car, or take another action.

  • Can harm be quantified in AI systems?

    — Yes, harm in AI systems can be quantified in order to determine insurance premiums and assess the impact of decisions made by the system.

  • How does the concept of harm relate to utility and probability of success?

    — The concept of harm in AI systems is closely related to utility and probability of success, as different treatments can either harm or benefit individuals based on their utility and the likelihood of success.

Play video
This article is a summary of a YouTube video "Defining Harm for Ai Systems - Computerphile" by Computerphile
4.5 (66 votes)
Report the article Report the article
Thanks for feedback Thank you for the feedback

We’ve got the additional info